Twelve weeks was the promise; you’re in week nineteen and the scaffold is still up. Delay is one of the most common complaints in domestic building, and one where your position depends almost entirely on what was written down at the start.

First, is the delay actually unexcused?

Programmes legitimately move. Before reaching for remedies, separate the causes:

  • Your changes, every variation with a time effect moved the date; so did late decisions on tiles, colours and fittings.
  • Genuinely unforeseen work, opened-up problems add real time.
  • Weather, external trades lose days to it; contracts usually excuse exceptional weather, not ordinary drizzle.
  • The builder’s own doing, under-resourcing your job while running three others, supplier problems of their own making, or plain slow progress. This is the unexcused category the remedies below exist for.

A well-run job records extensions as they happen (“+3 days, rot repair, agreed 4 May”) so the current contractual completion date is always known. If your project never did this, reconstructing it from messages and the site diary is step one.

Liquidated damages: the clean solution

A liquidated damages (LDs) clause states a fixed sum per week of unexcused overrun, commonly £100–£500/week on domestic work, and it should be a genuine pre-estimate of your likely loss (alternative accommodation, storage, extra childcare), not a punishment figure plucked from anger. Courts uphold honest pre-estimates; since 2015 a clause is struck down as a penalty only if the sum is out of all proportion to your legitimate interest in the work being finished on time.1

With LDs in place, late completion becomes deduction, not litigation: you withhold the stated sum from remaining payments, in writing, with the calculation shown. JCT Minor Works includes the mechanism, with the rate and period set against its clause 2.8.2 The Home Owner form doesn’t, leaving you with general damages instead.

No LDs clause? You still have rights

Where the contract fixes a date without LDs, unexcused overrun is a breach and you can claim actual, provable losses, rent, storage, wasted time off work, through the normal escalation route. Where no date was fixed at all, the Consumer Rights Act 2015 implies completion within a reasonable time; persistent drift beyond what comparable jobs take (benchmark honestly, a loft conversion typically takes around 8–12 weeks on site) is still actionable, just fuzzier.3 Fuzzier is expensive: this is why the contract checklist insists on dates.

Managing a live overrun

Remedies aside, you mostly want the job finished:

  1. Name the problem early. “We’re three weeks behind the agreed date, what’s the recovery plan?” in writing, at week 3, beats fury at week 9.
  2. Ask for a resourced recovery programme, which trades, which days, finishing when. Vague reassurance (“we’ll crack on”) predicts nothing.
  3. Protect the payment position. Stages tied to milestones mean a slow job is at least not draining money ahead of work. Never advance money to “help them finish faster”, it does the opposite.
  4. Set a longstop. A final written date after which you’ll treat the contract as at an end and complete with others, deducting the difference. Follow the termination steps properly before acting on it.

When late becomes abandoned

Gaps between visits stretching past a fortnight without explanation stop being “late” and start being abandonment, a different, more serious situation with its own playbook covered in the disputes series. The distinction matters legally, so keep dated notes of attendance; your record of who was on site when is the spine of any later claim.

This guide is general information for homeowners in England and Wales, not legal advice.

References (3)

Figures in this note were checked against the sources below on 30 September 2026. Superscript numbers in the text point to them. Every source the site cites, by topic.

  1. 1technicalvery strongUK Supreme Court (The National Archives, Find Case Law), guidance.RN-Q0PEASThe Supreme Court judgment that restated the penalty rule: a damages clause is unenforceable only if it is out of all proportion to the innocent party's legitimate interest.
  2. 2technicalstrongThe Joint Contracts Tribunal, guidance.RN-ISI9M3JCT's checklist for completing the Minor Works Building Contract 2024, which lists liquidated damages at clause 2.8 with a rate and period to be entered.
  3. 3technicalvery strongThe National Archives (legislation.gov.uk), legislation.RN-WUJM74Section 52(1) applies where the contract does not expressly fix the time for the service to be performed or say how it is to be fixed, and where no information treated as included under section 50 fixes the time either. In that case section 52(2) treats the contract as including a term that the trader must perform the service within a reasonable time, and section 52(3) makes what is reasonable a question of fact. Section 52(4) points to section 54; the remedy for breach of the reasonable time term is a price reduction under section 56, not repeat performance. This is the provision to cite when a builder has no contractual completion date and has overrun.
  1. Cavendish Square Holding BV v Makdessi; ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis 2015 UKSC 67, UK Supreme Court (The National Archives, Find Case Law), accessed 30 September 2026. caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk

  2. MW 2024 User Checklist, The Joint Contracts Tribunal, accessed 30 September 2026. jctltd.co.uk

  3. Consumer Rights Act 2015, section 52: service to be performed within a reasonable time, legislation.gov.uk, accessed 30 September 2026. legislation.gov.uk